Paint.NET Signature Tutorial

[Mossarelli]

Originally Posted by sKrod

If I was picking on mossarelli, I would say this:
Your signature contradicts your belief of " Feels good having your own made graphics Don't copy it if you can't make your own." because the picture(stock) sure as hell don't look like you drew/color it.

HAHA, PWNT! All but the tobi is my own work. I have actual saved flash files of the shit in the signature. Say Hi and I'll post them to pwn.
That was actually a bad picking.
And I have the no copy comment in my signature because I have experience of small little copy shit fucks. And I'm not making profit out of it, sue me.


In Paint.net? I'm surprised, nice work. I thought such a tag was not possible in the program. That really shows something.

[reBirth]

Originally Posted by mossarelli

HAHA, PWNT! All but the tobi is my own work. I have actual saved flash files of the shit in the signature. Say Hi and I'll post them to pwn.
That was actually a bad picking.
And I have the no copy comment in my signature because I have experience of small little copy shit fucks. And I'm not making profit out of it, sue me.

Those "small little copy shit fucks" aren't "making profit out of it" either, so what makes you different from them? So aren't you a "small little copy shit fuck" as well in the eyes of the artist who drew naruto?

[.create]

Using said tutorial, using different renders (Credit to Fenox) I was able to make a sky-like background with the same render used in the tutorial.

[MD]

I've been as helpful as I can be without being overly blunt about it, so I'll say it one last time: Improve or stop making tags.

Little harsh? Yeah, but if you don't improve, there's no point in making tags, as it stands, I doubt you'll get anywhere making tags with Paint.net, if you're still convinced that the advice given to you in this thread is incorrect, so be it, continue making tags and thinking they look good, won't make a difference to me.

[X2thaU]

man this is what the graphics lounge should be about and lmao @ paint.net. wtf is that

[reBirth]

Originally Posted by MD

I've been as helpful as I can be without being overly blunt about it, so I'll say it one last time: Improve or stop making tags.

Little harsh? Yeah, but if you don't improve, there's no point in making tags, as it stands, I doubt you'll get anywhere making tags with Paint.net, if you're still convinced that the advice given to you in this thread is incorrect, so be it, continue making tags and thinking they look good, won't make a difference to me.

pretty fucking truth spoken.

i came to nm with dled brushes thinking i was the shit cuz of previous experiance in way smaller forum.
but i kno my fcking place now. which... md already passed

[.Kaos]

^you don't improve if you make one thing per 4 months.




Oh fuck, I shouldn't be the one saying that.

[Mossarelli]

Originally Posted by sKrod

Those "small little copy shit fucks" aren't "making profit out of it" either, so what makes you different from them? So aren't you a "small little copy shit fuck" as well in the eyes of the artist who drew naruto?

I actually drew the work out of another, the only thing that I do not own with the pictures is the character. I own my right for the image. And the saying is for people who tend to copy other people´s tags and images in the signature. It happened to me before and it may again.

Originally Posted by sKrod

pretty fucking truth spoken.

i came to nm with dled brushes thinking i was the shit cuz of previous experiance in way smaller forum.
but i kno my fcking place now. which... md already passed

DL brushes is the shit.

I'm gonna drop this thread now. This has just gone far beyond screwed.

And anyone that feels insulted should not. It was not my intention to do so. This is a discussion forum, after all .

[X2thaU]

what? you advocate downloaded brushes AND original work???/ EXPLAIN YO SELF

[Mossarelli]

Originally Posted by X2thaU

what? you advocate downloaded brushes AND original work???/ EXPLAIN YO SELF

haha. lol.
I sure have to.

[MD]

Originally Posted by Hayate88

^you don't improve if you make one thing per 4 months.




Oh fuck, I shouldn't be the one saying that.

Me and my 80 tags a day will eventually catch up to you all.

[.create]

Originally Posted by Hayate88

^you don't improve if you make one thing per 4 months.




Oh fuck, I shouldn't be the one saying that.

4 months?

[Mossarelli]

Originally Posted by Haydes

4 months?

He wasn't refering to himself noir anyone else

[X2thaU]

Originally Posted by mossarelli

haha. lol.
I sure have to.

no. seriously.

[.ceyx]

Funny how some of the most engaging graphics discussions start with derailments.

I'll be cleaning this thread later on so go ahead, get it out now...

[Mossarelli]

Originally Posted by X2thaU

what? you advocate downloaded brushes AND original work???/ EXPLAIN YO SELF

DL brushes for a program you have bought made by people who bought the program and uploaded them for free is alright, right? Downloading images made by others uploaded by themself is not a problem, right?
Don't say that I encourage people to download illegaly by that sentence?

Originally Posted by X2thaU

no. seriously.

Originally Posted by .ceyx

Funny how some of the most engaging graphics discussions start with derailments.

I'll be cleaning this thread later on so go ahead, get it out now...

Throw it in the bin.

[~acadia]

Originally Posted by mossarelli

DL brushes for a program you have bought made by people who bought the program and uploaded them for free is alright, right? Downloading images made by others uploaded by themself is not a problem, right?
Don't say that I encourage people to download illegaly by that sentence?

He wasn't implying that you advocate illegal downloading. He was merely showing his contempt for someone who thinks that 'downloading brushes is the shit'. Downloading brushes goes against most of what we do here (original creations -- dl'd brushes are lame/not original).

=]

[Mossarelli]

Originally Posted by ~acadia

He wasn't implying that you advocate illegal downloading. He was merely showing his contempt for someone who thinks that 'downloading brushes is the shit'. Downloading brushes goes against most of what we do here (original creations -- dl'd brushes are lame/not original).

=]

If a brush helps me get the accuired style of mine I'd use it. If they're crap, I'd never use them. The butterfly effect brush is quite good for many things. But I would never paint a single butterfly with it.

[X2thaU]

Originally Posted by mossarelli

DL brushes for a program you have bought made by people who bought the program and uploaded them for free is alright, right? Downloading images made by others uploaded by themself is not a problem, right?
Don't say that I encourage people to download illegaly by that sentence?

seriously, your questions show that you haven't thought your actions through =/

when you make a tag or w/e and use a stock and then show it off -> people are going to assume that you did not draw/render/photograph your stock, and you got it somehow through an outside source. Unless otherwise stated, people know that you yourself take no credit the creation of the original stock material. This is why you do not get critiqued on the actual content of the stock, both its orientation within your sig.

When you incorporate other ingredients into the mix (i.e. brushes, renders), it is assumed that you personally put in work for everything. When that is not the case, you basically lied to your critics because they will be under the assumption that you created every single effect on that tag, and the truth is that you didn't.